Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4381 to 4400 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tax deduction at source on leave fare concession payments was not required where binding interim judicial directions prohibited deduction or recovery. Vacation of those directions operated prospectively and could not retrospectively impose a recovery obligation on the employer. An employer acting in compliance with such orders could not be treated as an assessee in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A). Liability under section 201 required verification of whether employees, as primary taxpayers, had discharged their tax liability; it was not automatic merely because tax had not been deducted. The demand and consequential interest were deleted.
Tax deduction at source on leave fare concession payments was not required where binding interim judicial directions prohibited deduction or recovery. Vacation of those directions operated prospectively and could not retrospectively impose a recovery obligation on the employer. An employer acting in compliance with such orders could not be treated as an assessee in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A). Liability under section 201 required verification of whether employees, as primary taxpayers, had discharged their tax liability; it was not automatic merely because tax had not been deducted. The demand and consequential interest were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
