Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Tax deduction at source on leave fare concession payments was not required where binding interim judicial directions prohibited deduction or recovery. Vacation of those directions operated prospectively and could not retrospectively impose a recovery obligation on the employer. An employer acting in compliance with such orders could not be treated as an assessee in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A). Liability under section 201 required verification of whether employees, as primary taxpayers, had discharged their tax liability; it was not automatic merely because tax had not been deducted. The demand and consequential interest were deleted.
Tax deduction at source on leave fare concession payments was not required where binding interim judicial directions prohibited deduction or recovery. Vacation of those directions operated prospectively and could not retrospectively impose a recovery obligation on the employer. An employer acting in compliance with such orders could not be treated as an assessee in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A). Liability under section 201 required verification of whether employees, as primary taxpayers, had discharged their tax liability; it was not automatic merely because tax had not been deducted. The demand and consequential interest were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
