Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Section 43CA does not apply to a land-sale transaction where the...
Pre-enactment land-sale agreements escape stamp-duty value substitution where substantial banking-channel consideration was received before Section 43CA commenced.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 43CA does not apply to a land-sale transaction where the agreement to sell was executed and substantial non-cash consideration was received through banking channels before the provision came into force. Although registration occurred later, it merely fulfilled contractual obligations substantively discharged before enactment. Section 43CA, which substitutes stamp-duty value for consideration on transfer of land or buildings held as stock-in-trade, could not be invoked retrospectively in these circumstances. A contrary precedent was distinguishable because payment through account-payee cheques at the agreement stage had not been established there. The stamp-duty valuation addition was deleted, making the valuation-reference plea unnecessary.
Section 43CA does not apply to a land-sale transaction where the agreement to sell was executed and substantial non-cash consideration was received through banking channels before the provision came into force. Although registration occurred later, it merely fulfilled contractual obligations substantively discharged before enactment. Section 43CA, which substitutes stamp-duty value for consideration on transfer of land or buildings held as stock-in-trade, could not be invoked retrospectively in these circumstances. A contrary precedent was distinguishable because payment through account-payee cheques at the agreement stage had not been established there. The stamp-duty valuation addition was deleted, making the valuation-reference plea unnecessary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
