Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Section 49(2AA) treats the fair market value used to value an ESOP perquisite under section 17(2)(vi) as the cost of acquisition for capital gains purposes, without requiring that the perquisite be included in taxable income or taxed in India. Perquisite valuation and its taxability under domestic charging provisions or an applicable treaty operate independently. Taxation of the related perquisite in the United Kingdom does not prevent use of the statutory fair market value as the ESOP share cost. Capital gains were to be recomputed using the fair market value determined under section 17(2)(vi) read with Rule 3(8)(ii).
Section 49(2AA) treats the fair market value used to value an ESOP perquisite under section 17(2)(vi) as the cost of acquisition for capital gains purposes, without requiring that the perquisite be included in taxable income or taxed in India. Perquisite valuation and its taxability under domestic charging provisions or an applicable treaty operate independently. Taxation of the related perquisite in the United Kingdom does not prevent use of the statutory fair market value as the ESOP share cost. Capital gains were to be recomputed using the fair market value determined under section 17(2)(vi) read with Rule 3(8)(ii).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
