Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SAFTA preferential tariff treatment could not be denied solely because the six-digit tariff classification in the country-of-origin certificate differed from the re-determined classification. Where the goods' description and Bangladeshi origin were undisputed, the revised headings remained covered by the exemption, and no specified ground for denial was established, the applicable origin rules required verification and consultation before rejecting preference. Transaction value could not be enhanced merely using NIDB data for allegedly similar branded goods without evidence of counterfeit goods, invoice unreliability, comparable quality or other relevant textile characteristics. The preferential exemption and declared value were restored, with consequential duty, interest, penalty, confiscation, redemption fine and bank guarantee measures set aside or released.
SAFTA preferential tariff treatment could not be denied solely because the six-digit tariff classification in the country-of-origin certificate differed from the re-determined classification. Where the goods' description and Bangladeshi origin were undisputed, the revised headings remained covered by the exemption, and no specified ground for denial was established, the applicable origin rules required verification and consultation before rejecting preference. Transaction value could not be enhanced merely using NIDB data for allegedly similar branded goods without evidence of counterfeit goods, invoice unreliability, comparable quality or other relevant textile characteristics. The preferential exemption and declared value were restored, with consequential duty, interest, penalty, confiscation, redemption fine and bank guarantee measures set aside or released.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
