Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
SAFTA preferential tariff treatment could not be denied solely because the six-digit tariff classification in the country-of-origin certificate differed from the re-determined classification. Where the goods' description and Bangladeshi origin were undisputed, the revised headings remained covered by the exemption, and no specified ground for denial was established, the applicable origin rules required verification and consultation before rejecting preference. Transaction value could not be enhanced merely using NIDB data for allegedly similar branded goods without evidence of counterfeit goods, invoice unreliability, comparable quality or other relevant textile characteristics. The preferential exemption and declared value were restored, with consequential duty, interest, penalty, confiscation, redemption fine and bank guarantee measures set aside or released.
SAFTA preferential tariff treatment could not be denied solely because the six-digit tariff classification in the country-of-origin certificate differed from the re-determined classification. Where the goods' description and Bangladeshi origin were undisputed, the revised headings remained covered by the exemption, and no specified ground for denial was established, the applicable origin rules required verification and consultation before rejecting preference. Transaction value could not be enhanced merely using NIDB data for allegedly similar branded goods without evidence of counterfeit goods, invoice unreliability, comparable quality or other relevant textile characteristics. The preferential exemption and declared value were restored, with consequential duty, interest, penalty, confiscation, redemption fine and bank guarantee measures set aside or released.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.