Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Customs exemption for imported flavour compounds classified under Customs Tariff Heading 3302 remains available unless Revenue establishes that the goods are compound alcoholic preparations of the prescribed alcoholic strength and of a kind used to manufacture beverages. Prior denial of exemption for flavours actually used in beverage manufacture did not itself prove that goods supplied to a tobacco manufacturer fell within the exclusion. An earlier test report, without testing the present consignment, was insufficient to establish the exclusion. As Revenue did not discharge that burden, denial of the claimed exemption was unsustainable and was set aside.
Customs exemption for imported flavour compounds classified under Customs Tariff Heading 3302 remains available unless Revenue establishes that the goods are compound alcoholic preparations of the prescribed alcoholic strength and of a kind used to manufacture beverages. Prior denial of exemption for flavours actually used in beverage manufacture did not itself prove that goods supplied to a tobacco manufacturer fell within the exclusion. An earlier test report, without testing the present consignment, was insufficient to establish the exclusion. As Revenue did not discharge that burden, denial of the claimed exemption was unsustainable and was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.