Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Failure to maintain the prescribed Net Owned Fund justified cancellation of an NBFC's registration. A pending amalgamation proposal did not satisfy the requirement because approval, implementation and any resulting capital increase remained contingent. Judicial review was confined to procedural legality, natural justice and jurisdictional error; no defect was identified in the cancellation or appellate process. The amalgamation proposal was rejected and that rejection was not separately challenged. As the company also could not meet the subsisting Net Owned Fund requirement, setting aside cancellation would have been futile. The High Court upheld cancellation and dismissed the writ petition.
Failure to maintain the prescribed Net Owned Fund justified cancellation of an NBFC's registration. A pending amalgamation proposal did not satisfy the requirement because approval, implementation and any resulting capital increase remained contingent. Judicial review was confined to procedural legality, natural justice and jurisdictional error; no defect was identified in the cancellation or appellate process. The amalgamation proposal was rejected and that rejection was not separately challenged. As the company also could not meet the subsisting Net Owned Fund requirement, setting aside cancellation would have been futile. The High Court upheld cancellation and dismissed the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.