Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
A search initiated after 1 April 2021 does not itself bar a...
Post-search scrutiny assessment remains available where original assessment limitation is unexpired, permitting timely completion under regular assessment procedure.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
A search initiated after 1 April 2021 does not itself bar a regular scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3). The post-search deeming provision for information suggesting escaped income permits reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 where original assessment proceedings have concluded or the time limit for scrutiny has expired. Where a return can still be processed or subjected to scrutiny within limitation, it may be addressed under Sections 143(1) or 143(3). A timely notice for scrutiny and timely assessment therefore remain valid despite the search. Participation in proceedings without objection also supported rejection of the jurisdictional challenge and consequential recovery action.
A search initiated after 1 April 2021 does not itself bar a regular scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3). The post-search deeming provision for information suggesting escaped income permits reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 where original assessment proceedings have concluded or the time limit for scrutiny has expired. Where a return can still be processed or subjected to scrutiny within limitation, it may be addressed under Sections 143(1) or 143(3). A timely notice for scrutiny and timely assessment therefore remain valid despite the search. Participation in proceedings without objection also supported rejection of the jurisdictional challenge and consequential recovery action.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.