Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95749 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A search initiated after 1 April 2021 does not itself bar a...
Post-search scrutiny assessment remains available where original assessment limitation is unexpired, permitting timely completion under regular assessment procedure.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
A search initiated after 1 April 2021 does not itself bar a regular scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3). The post-search deeming provision for information suggesting escaped income permits reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 where original assessment proceedings have concluded or the time limit for scrutiny has expired. Where a return can still be processed or subjected to scrutiny within limitation, it may be addressed under Sections 143(1) or 143(3). A timely notice for scrutiny and timely assessment therefore remain valid despite the search. Participation in proceedings without objection also supported rejection of the jurisdictional challenge and consequential recovery action.
A search initiated after 1 April 2021 does not itself bar a regular scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3). The post-search deeming provision for information suggesting escaped income permits reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 where original assessment proceedings have concluded or the time limit for scrutiny has expired. Where a return can still be processed or subjected to scrutiny within limitation, it may be addressed under Sections 143(1) or 143(3). A timely notice for scrutiny and timely assessment therefore remain valid despite the search. Participation in proceedings without objection also supported rejection of the jurisdictional challenge and consequential recovery action.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.