Fraud-based GST assessment cannot stand without allegations of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression; proceedings must follow normal classificatio...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1341 to 1360 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A bona fide deduction claim under section 80P(2)(a)(i), previously accepted in scrutiny assessment and rectification proceedings, was not treated as under-reported income in the stated circumstances. The notes state that section 270A(1) uses "may", requiring consideration of the full circumstances rather than automatic penalty. They further state that a penalty notice and order referring only generally to section 270A, without specifying the applicable sub-clause or limb, cannot sustain the penalty. The reported conclusion is that the penalty for under-reporting was deleted.
A bona fide deduction claim under section 80P(2)(a)(i), previously accepted in scrutiny assessment and rectification proceedings, was not treated as under-reported income in the stated circumstances. The notes state that section 270A(1) uses "may", requiring consideration of the full circumstances rather than automatic penalty. They further state that a penalty notice and order referring only generally to section 270A, without specifying the applicable sub-clause or limb, cannot sustain the penalty. The reported conclusion is that the penalty for under-reporting was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
