Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
281 to 300 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claims for IGST paid on imported goods by a United Nations agency were not time-barred because, before Circular No. 23/2019-Customs, no authority was prescribed to receive such claims despite the statutory entitlement to refund. Applying the binding CESTAT decision in World Health Organization, limitation ran from 1 August 2019, with the Supreme Court's COVID-19 limitation extension also applying. The Tribunal therefore set aside the orders rejecting the claims as time-barred and allowed the appeals with consequential relief.
Refund claims for IGST paid on imported goods by a United Nations agency were not time-barred because, before Circular No. 23/2019-Customs, no authority was prescribed to receive such claims despite the statutory entitlement to refund. Applying the binding CESTAT decision in World Health Organization, limitation ran from 1 August 2019, with the Supreme Court's COVID-19 limitation extension also applying. The Tribunal therefore set aside the orders rejecting the claims as time-barred and allowed the appeals with consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
