Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1341 to 1360 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Enforcement of appellate directions under an approved resolution...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distribution.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Enforcement of appellate directions under an approved resolution plan remains effective unless the Supreme Court grants a stay. The note explains that an earlier appellate direction had recognised an admitted claim and required the Monitoring Committee to redistribute plan allocations and determine distribution of escrowed funds. As no stay against distribution had been obtained in the pending Supreme Court challenge, the Tribunal declined to suspend implementation or permit exclusive implementation of the CoC resolution. The application to restrain distribution was therefore dismissed as misconceived.
Enforcement of appellate directions under an approved resolution plan remains effective unless the Supreme Court grants a stay. The note explains that an earlier appellate direction had recognised an admitted claim and required the Monitoring Committee to redistribute plan allocations and determine distribution of escrowed funds. As no stay against distribution had been obtained in the pending Supreme Court challenge, the Tribunal declined to suspend implementation or permit exclusive implementation of the CoC resolution. The application to restrain distribution was therefore dismissed as misconceived.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.