Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Third-party claims to attached property under the Prevention of...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides remain unresolved.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Third-party claims to attached property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act require adjudication before the Special Court where purchasers rely on agreements to sell but hold no registered sale deeds. The Tribunal noted that the available material could not conclusively establish whether the purchasers were bona fide or colluded with the principal accused, despite possible vendor misdeclaration that plots remained unsold. Purchasers may pursue their ownership and release claims before the Special Court, while the Enforcement Directorate may verify the claims and report to that Court; no final finding on bona fides or ownership was made.
Third-party claims to attached property under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act require adjudication before the Special Court where purchasers rely on agreements to sell but hold no registered sale deeds. The Tribunal noted that the available material could not conclusively establish whether the purchasers were bona fide or colluded with the principal accused, despite possible vendor misdeclaration that plots remained unsold. Purchasers may pursue their ownership and release claims before the Special Court, while the Enforcement Directorate may verify the claims and report to that Court; no final finding on bona fides or ownership was made.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.