Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Retention of seized documents under GST requires a valid seizure authorisation and continuing necessity for proceedings under the Act. Sections 67(2) and 67(11) operate together: documents may be retained only when seized by a duly authorised official and required for GST proceedings. Where the underlying authorisation is withdrawn, the basis for seizure and consequential retention ceases, and the authorities cannot retain materials obtained during the inspection. The text states that all files and documents must be returned immediately and that a statement recorded during the inspection carries no legal consequence.
Retention of seized documents under GST requires a valid seizure authorisation and continuing necessity for proceedings under the Act. Sections 67(2) and 67(11) operate together: documents may be retained only when seized by a duly authorised official and required for GST proceedings. Where the underlying authorisation is withdrawn, the basis for seizure and consequential retention ceases, and the authorities cannot retain materials obtained during the inspection. The text states that all files and documents must be returned immediately and that a statement recorded during the inspection carries no legal consequence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.