Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
GST registration cancelled for non-existence at the declared principal place of business was considered for restoration where the address discrepancy arose from a genuine mistake. The HC noted that the change of address was not intended to circumvent the law, no GST demand was outstanding, and the taxpayer undertook to pay applicable charges, late fees and penalty. Finding that restoration would permit lawful conduct of business without prejudicing Revenue, the HC directed restoration of the cancelled registration subject to payment of the amounts intimated by the respondents.
GST registration cancelled for non-existence at the declared principal place of business was considered for restoration where the address discrepancy arose from a genuine mistake. The HC noted that the change of address was not intended to circumvent the law, no GST demand was outstanding, and the taxpayer undertook to pay applicable charges, late fees and penalty. Finding that restoration would permit lawful conduct of business without prejudicing Revenue, the HC directed restoration of the cancelled registration subject to payment of the amounts intimated by the respondents.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.