Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1461 to 1480 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Characterisation of flat-sale proceeds depends primarily on the taxpayer's intention, determined from the totality of circumstances, including the stated objects, consistent investment treatment, period of holding, leasing efforts, absence of other projects, and lack of regular trading activity. Although book treatment is not conclusive, it is relevant. Sales over different years after unsuccessful efforts to obtain tenants did not amount to an adventure in the nature of trade. Where the Revenue had accepted capital-gains treatment in earlier years and no distinguishing facts or incriminating material existed, consistency required the same treatment. The proceeds were therefore assessable as capital gains rather than business income, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Characterisation of flat-sale proceeds depends primarily on the taxpayer's intention, determined from the totality of circumstances, including the stated objects, consistent investment treatment, period of holding, leasing efforts, absence of other projects, and lack of regular trading activity. Although book treatment is not conclusive, it is relevant. Sales over different years after unsuccessful efforts to obtain tenants did not amount to an adventure in the nature of trade. Where the Revenue had accepted capital-gains treatment in earlier years and no distinguishing facts or incriminating material existed, consistency required the same treatment. The proceeds were therefore assessable as capital gains rather than business income, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
