Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Higher depreciation was allowed for commercial vehicles acquired...
Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Higher depreciation was allowed for commercial vehicles acquired during the specified period and included in the relevant asset block. Warranty provisions were allowed because they were scientifically determined, consistently applied and inextricably linked to sales rather than contingent liabilities. For approved in-house research facilities, approval of the facility was treated as material, while the difference between approved and incurred expenditure was remitted for limited verification. Expenditure disallowance relating to exempt income was deleted: joint-venture investments produced no exempt income, and interest-free funds exceeded investments yielding exempt income. The deduction for employing new workmen was allowed consistently with earlier years. Both appeals succeeded, subject to limited verification of the research deduction.
Higher depreciation was allowed for commercial vehicles acquired during the specified period and included in the relevant asset block. Warranty provisions were allowed because they were scientifically determined, consistently applied and inextricably linked to sales rather than contingent liabilities. For approved in-house research facilities, approval of the facility was treated as material, while the difference between approved and incurred expenditure was remitted for limited verification. Expenditure disallowance relating to exempt income was deleted: joint-venture investments produced no exempt income, and interest-free funds exceeded investments yielding exempt income. The deduction for employing new workmen was allowed consistently with earlier years. Both appeals succeeded, subject to limited verification of the research deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.