Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Higher depreciation was allowed for commercial vehicles acquired...
Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Higher depreciation was allowed for commercial vehicles acquired during the specified period and included in the relevant asset block. Warranty provisions were allowed because they were scientifically determined, consistently applied and inextricably linked to sales rather than contingent liabilities. For approved in-house research facilities, approval of the facility was treated as material, while the difference between approved and incurred expenditure was remitted for limited verification. Expenditure disallowance relating to exempt income was deleted: joint-venture investments produced no exempt income, and interest-free funds exceeded investments yielding exempt income. The deduction for employing new workmen was allowed consistently with earlier years. Both appeals succeeded, subject to limited verification of the research deduction.
Higher depreciation was allowed for commercial vehicles acquired during the specified period and included in the relevant asset block. Warranty provisions were allowed because they were scientifically determined, consistently applied and inextricably linked to sales rather than contingent liabilities. For approved in-house research facilities, approval of the facility was treated as material, while the difference between approved and incurred expenditure was remitted for limited verification. Expenditure disallowance relating to exempt income was deleted: joint-venture investments produced no exempt income, and interest-free funds exceeded investments yielding exempt income. The deduction for employing new workmen was allowed consistently with earlier years. Both appeals succeeded, subject to limited verification of the research deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
