Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
A return filed in response to a notice under section 148, when filed within the period specified in that notice, is treated under section 148(2) as a return furnished under section 139. Read together, sections 148 and 80AC permit a deduction claim where the reassessment return is timely, notwithstanding that no original return was filed under section 139(1). The text also explains that revision under section 263 is not warranted where the assessment record shows that the deduction claim was examined and allowed after application of mind; the assessment order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue interests.
A return filed in response to a notice under section 148, when filed within the period specified in that notice, is treated under section 148(2) as a return furnished under section 139. Read together, sections 148 and 80AC permit a deduction claim where the reassessment return is timely, notwithstanding that no original return was filed under section 139(1). The text also explains that revision under section 263 is not warranted where the assessment record shows that the deduction claim was examined and allowed after application of mind; the assessment order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue interests.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
