Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transferable DFIA licences remained valid despite penalties imposed on the exporter, as they were not cancelled. The text explains that where proceedings against the exporter resulted in the duty demand being dropped and allegations against the importer were unproved, the importer could not be treated as having used fraudulent means to make duty-free imports. Those circumstances also did not justify invoking the extended limitation period. The customs-duty demand was therefore dropped, and the Revenue's appeal against that outcome was dismissed.
Transferable DFIA licences remained valid despite penalties imposed on the exporter, as they were not cancelled. The text explains that where proceedings against the exporter resulted in the duty demand being dropped and allegations against the importer were unproved, the importer could not be treated as having used fraudulent means to make duty-free imports. Those circumstances also did not justify invoking the extended limitation period. The customs-duty demand was therefore dropped, and the Revenue's appeal against that outcome was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.