Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Section 80P deduction covers Souharda credit societies, including qualifying surplus-deposit interest, subject to member KYC verification for cash dep...
Constitutional judicial review under Article 226 may extend to...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental interests.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Constitutional judicial review under Article 226 may extend to an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) and consequential proceedings under the PMLA where they underpin coercive action affecting liberty, property or reputation. Although an ECIR is characterised as an internal administrative document rather than an FIR, that characterisation does not bar constitutional scrutiny. Decisions declining to quash an ECIR under the inherent jurisdiction in Section 482 CrPC do not limit the broader scope of Article 226 review. The High Court may examine the ECIR's legality together with the connected proceedings, avoiding fragmentation of a single cause of action. The preliminary objection was rejected and the writ petition was held maintainable for consideration on merits.
Constitutional judicial review under Article 226 may extend to an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) and consequential proceedings under the PMLA where they underpin coercive action affecting liberty, property or reputation. Although an ECIR is characterised as an internal administrative document rather than an FIR, that characterisation does not bar constitutional scrutiny. Decisions declining to quash an ECIR under the inherent jurisdiction in Section 482 CrPC do not limit the broader scope of Article 226 review. The High Court may examine the ECIR's legality together with the connected proceedings, avoiding fragmentation of a single cause of action. The preliminary objection was rejected and the writ petition was held maintainable for consideration on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
