Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
For customs valuation, the amended transaction-value regime requires acceptance of the price actually paid or payable in the particular import transaction where buyer and seller are unrelated and price is the sole consideration. Where the original consignee defaulted without payment, bill of entry, title, or delivery, its initial contract did not establish the relevant sale value. The subsequent importer's renegotiated price paid to the overseas supplier was treated as transaction value because no relationship, additional consideration, or excess payment was alleged. Earlier deemed-value rulings under the pre-amendment regime were inapplicable. The majority view sustained the declared value and dismissed Revenue's appeal.
For customs valuation, the amended transaction-value regime requires acceptance of the price actually paid or payable in the particular import transaction where buyer and seller are unrelated and price is the sole consideration. Where the original consignee defaulted without payment, bill of entry, title, or delivery, its initial contract did not establish the relevant sale value. The subsequent importer's renegotiated price paid to the overseas supplier was treated as transaction value because no relationship, additional consideration, or excess payment was alleged. Earlier deemed-value rulings under the pre-amendment regime were inapplicable. The majority view sustained the declared value and dismissed Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.