Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where alleged bogus purchases are not supported by proof of actual goods movement, but the books, sales and disclosed profits remain accepted, only the profit element embedded in those purchases may be disallowed rather than their full value. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's factual estimate of a 10 per cent disallowance, finding no legal infirmity. On reassessment, a notice under section 148A(b) need not supply every item of material held by the Assessing Officer; the prescribed reopening procedure was found to have been followed. The challenges to both the disallowance restriction and reassessment were rejected, and both cross-appeals were dismissed.
Where alleged bogus purchases are not supported by proof of actual goods movement, but the books, sales and disclosed profits remain accepted, only the profit element embedded in those purchases may be disallowed rather than their full value. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's factual estimate of a 10 per cent disallowance, finding no legal infirmity. On reassessment, a notice under section 148A(b) need not supply every item of material held by the Assessing Officer; the prescribed reopening procedure was found to have been followed. The challenges to both the disallowance restriction and reassessment were rejected, and both cross-appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
