Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking of subcontract payments under a...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh benchmarking.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer-pricing benchmarking of subcontract payments under a highway operation, maintenance and transfer contract must use the Transactional Net Margin Method where Common Schedule of Rates cannot be reliably correlated with the work allocated under related-party and third-party subcontracts. The schedule rates, including basic and premium components, were not shown to permit verification as an internal comparable; the proposed other method was therefore not accepted. Comparables selected on a build, maintain and transfer profile were functionally unsuitable because the contract covered operation and maintenance of an existing highway with ancillary facilities. Fresh benchmarking was directed using functionally comparable operation, maintenance and transfer entities after giving the assessee an opportunity to respond.
Transfer-pricing benchmarking of subcontract payments under a highway operation, maintenance and transfer contract must use the Transactional Net Margin Method where Common Schedule of Rates cannot be reliably correlated with the work allocated under related-party and third-party subcontracts. The schedule rates, including basic and premium components, were not shown to permit verification as an internal comparable; the proposed other method was therefore not accepted. Comparables selected on a build, maintain and transfer profile were functionally unsuitable because the contract covered operation and maintenance of an existing highway with ancillary facilities. Fresh benchmarking was directed using functionally comparable operation, maintenance and transfer entities after giving the assessee an opportunity to respond.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
