Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Appeals concerning anti-dumping duty and customs valuation fall outside the High Court's appellate jurisdiction under section 130 where they relate to the rate of duty or value of goods for assessment. Questions regarding anti-dumping duty and rejection or redetermination of declared import values must instead be pursued before the Supreme Court under section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962. The departmental appeal was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with liberty to use the statutory remedy before the Supreme Court.
Appeals concerning anti-dumping duty and customs valuation fall outside the High Court's appellate jurisdiction under section 130 where they relate to the rate of duty or value of goods for assessment. Questions regarding anti-dumping duty and rejection or redetermination of declared import values must instead be pursued before the Supreme Court under section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962. The departmental appeal was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with liberty to use the statutory remedy before the Supreme Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
