Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Page of 4780
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 95596 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appeals concerning anti-dumping duty and customs valuation fall outside the High Court's appellate jurisdiction under section 130 where they relate to the rate of duty or value of goods for assessment. Questions regarding anti-dumping duty and rejection or redetermination of declared import values must instead be pursued before the Supreme Court under section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962. The departmental appeal was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with liberty to use the statutory remedy before the Supreme Court.
Appeals concerning anti-dumping duty and customs valuation fall outside the High Court's appellate jurisdiction under section 130 where they relate to the rate of duty or value of goods for assessment. Questions regarding anti-dumping duty and rejection or redetermination of declared import values must instead be pursued before the Supreme Court under section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962. The departmental appeal was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction, with liberty to use the statutory remedy before the Supreme Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.