Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
941 to 960 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Post-award interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are available to any party to an arbitration agreement, including an unsuccessful arbitral party with no award in its favour. The provision's plain language does not confine relief to award-holders, while Sections 34 and 36 separately address challenges to and stays of awards. An unsuccessful party must satisfy the usual tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury under a higher threshold. Relief should therefore be granted only carefully, cautiously and in rare, compelling circumstances to prevent irreparable prejudice and preserve challenge proceedings.
Post-award interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are available to any party to an arbitration agreement, including an unsuccessful arbitral party with no award in its favour. The provision's plain language does not confine relief to award-holders, while Sections 34 and 36 separately address challenges to and stays of awards. An unsuccessful party must satisfy the usual tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury under a higher threshold. Relief should therefore be granted only carefully, cautiously and in rare, compelling circumstances to prevent irreparable prejudice and preserve challenge proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
