Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Post-award interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are available to any party to an arbitration agreement, including an unsuccessful arbitral party with no award in its favour. The provision's plain language does not confine relief to award-holders, while Sections 34 and 36 separately address challenges to and stays of awards. An unsuccessful party must satisfy the usual tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury under a higher threshold. Relief should therefore be granted only carefully, cautiously and in rare, compelling circumstances to prevent irreparable prejudice and preserve challenge proceedings.
Post-award interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are available to any party to an arbitration agreement, including an unsuccessful arbitral party with no award in its favour. The provision's plain language does not confine relief to award-holders, while Sections 34 and 36 separately address challenges to and stays of awards. An unsuccessful party must satisfy the usual tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury under a higher threshold. Relief should therefore be granted only carefully, cautiously and in rare, compelling circumstances to prevent irreparable prejudice and preserve challenge proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.