Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
An authorised courier was not liable for regulatory action or penalty for abetment of smuggling where no evidence established its involvement in, or knowledge of, gold concealed in consignment cartons. The concealment was detectable only by X-ray examination upon arrival, while the courier acted bona fide and exercised due diligence. Proceedings for penalty relating to the contraband had also been dropped. The Tribunal sustained the order dropping proceedings against the courier and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
An authorised courier was not liable for regulatory action or penalty for abetment of smuggling where no evidence established its involvement in, or knowledge of, gold concealed in consignment cartons. The concealment was detectable only by X-ray examination upon arrival, while the courier acted bona fide and exercised due diligence. Proceedings for penalty relating to the contraband had also been dropped. The Tribunal sustained the order dropping proceedings against the courier and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.