Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cross-objections under section 129A(4) may challenge any part of an appealed order and are to be disposed of as an appeal; the article notes that the preliminary objection to their scope was overruled. It reports that declared import values could not be rejected without evidence that a related-party relationship influenced price, that proforma invoices reflected additional consideration, or that remittances exceeded declared values. Revised retail sale price demands were described as unsupported because relevant invoices were not supplied and no statutory post-import redetermination mechanism existed. A therapeutic transdermal patch was treated as a medicament rather than a skin-care product. The article further notes that redemption fine was unavailable where goods were unavailable and confiscation grounds failed.
Cross-objections under section 129A(4) may challenge any part of an appealed order and are to be disposed of as an appeal; the article notes that the preliminary objection to their scope was overruled. It reports that declared import values could not be rejected without evidence that a related-party relationship influenced price, that proforma invoices reflected additional consideration, or that remittances exceeded declared values. Revised retail sale price demands were described as unsupported because relevant invoices were not supplied and no statutory post-import redetermination mechanism existed. A therapeutic transdermal patch was treated as a medicament rather than a skin-care product. The article further notes that redemption fine was unavailable where goods were unavailable and confiscation grounds failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
