Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Documentary material, including the complainant's affidavit, dishonoured cheque, return memos, demand notice and MoU, may satisfy the mandatory inquiry under Sections 200 and 202 of the Code before process is issued against an accused residing outside the Magistrate's territorial jurisdiction. On admitted cheque execution and non-payment after notice, the presumptions of consideration and legally enforceable liability under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act apply. Defences that security cheques were prematurely presented, liability had not arisen under the MoU, or fraud occurred raise factual issues for trial and cannot displace those rebuttable presumptions through inherent jurisdiction at the pre-trial stage. The challenges were rejected and trial was directed to proceed expeditiously.
Documentary material, including the complainant's affidavit, dishonoured cheque, return memos, demand notice and MoU, may satisfy the mandatory inquiry under Sections 200 and 202 of the Code before process is issued against an accused residing outside the Magistrate's territorial jurisdiction. On admitted cheque execution and non-payment after notice, the presumptions of consideration and legally enforceable liability under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act apply. Defences that security cheques were prematurely presented, liability had not arisen under the MoU, or fraud occurred raise factual issues for trial and cannot displace those rebuttable presumptions through inherent jurisdiction at the pre-trial stage. The challenges were rejected and trial was directed to proceed expeditiously.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.