Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3321 to 3340 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 73(2) must be read with the adjudication limitation in Section 73(10): it requires issuance of notice at least three months before expiry of the order-making limitation, but does not mandate a three-month interval between notice and adjudication. Reasonable opportunity to respond remains necessary under natural justice. The discussion also identifies that assessment orders for the same period cannot rest on contradictory assumptions that supplies are both exempt for input tax credit purposes and taxable otherwise. Subject to stipulated remittance after adjustment of recoveries, the inconsistent orders were set aside and remanded for fresh consideration, including examination of whether the supplies are exempt.
Section 73(2) must be read with the adjudication limitation in Section 73(10): it requires issuance of notice at least three months before expiry of the order-making limitation, but does not mandate a three-month interval between notice and adjudication. Reasonable opportunity to respond remains necessary under natural justice. The discussion also identifies that assessment orders for the same period cannot rest on contradictory assumptions that supplies are both exempt for input tax credit purposes and taxable otherwise. Subject to stipulated remittance after adjustment of recoveries, the inconsistent orders were set aside and remanded for fresh consideration, including examination of whether the supplies are exempt.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
