Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Additions for alleged unexplained chit subscriptions require year-specific corroborative evidence; an annual average derived from aggregate chit dealings and an uncorroborated statement cannot establish fresh investment in the relevant year. Loose sheets showing unpaid instalments and loan liabilities do not prove undisclosed income where bid amounts were repayable through later instalments. Likewise, unexplained interest expenditure requires evidence of actual payment in the relevant year; an estimate based on averaged aggregate figures is insufficient, particularly where interest was deducted upfront from borrowings. The ITAT sustained deletion of additions under sections 69 and 69C and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
Additions for alleged unexplained chit subscriptions require year-specific corroborative evidence; an annual average derived from aggregate chit dealings and an uncorroborated statement cannot establish fresh investment in the relevant year. Loose sheets showing unpaid instalments and loan liabilities do not prove undisclosed income where bid amounts were repayable through later instalments. Likewise, unexplained interest expenditure requires evidence of actual payment in the relevant year; an estimate based on averaged aggregate figures is insufficient, particularly where interest was deducted upfront from borrowings. The ITAT sustained deletion of additions under sections 69 and 69C and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.