Statutory transfer formalities invalidated alleged share and property transfers, while retrospective record manipulation constituted oppression and mi...
Provisional attachment of laundered funds and equivalent-value property sustained, with statutory protection limited to pension, gratuity and providen...
Insolvency moratorium does not shield company officers from cheque dishonour prosecution for liability arising before corporate insolvency proceedings...
Penalty for aiding and abetting import misdeclaration requires proof that the Customs Broker or its G-Card holder had knowledge of, and knowingly participated in, the importer's quantity misdeclaration. Processing import documents and filing Bills of Entry based on documents supplied by the importer does not by itself establish such knowledge. The notes state that, without corroborative evidence of prior knowledge or conscious assistance in duty evasion, penalty under Section 112(a)(ii) cannot be sustained; the penalties were therefore set aside with consequential relief.
Penalty for aiding and abetting import misdeclaration requires proof that the Customs Broker or its G-Card holder had knowledge of, and knowingly participated in, the importer's quantity misdeclaration. Processing import documents and filing Bills of Entry based on documents supplied by the importer does not by itself establish such knowledge. The notes state that, without corroborative evidence of prior knowledge or conscious assistance in duty evasion, penalty under Section 112(a)(ii) cannot be sustained; the penalties were therefore set aside with consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.