Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Prompt credit of refunds under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme is emphasised despite the Scheme's exclusion of statutory refund interest. The notes state that excluding interest under section 244A does not justify revenue officials retaining a refund determined through Form No. 4 for months. They identify claimed non-availability of a processing module and competing statutory work as inadequate explanations for recurring delays, and record directions to verify system constraints and ensure timely refund processing. The writ petition remained pending while additional time was granted to report on credit of the processed refund.
Prompt credit of refunds under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme is emphasised despite the Scheme's exclusion of statutory refund interest. The notes state that excluding interest under section 244A does not justify revenue officials retaining a refund determined through Form No. 4 for months. They identify claimed non-availability of a processing module and competing statutory work as inadequate explanations for recurring delays, and record directions to verify system constraints and ensure timely refund processing. The writ petition remained pending while additional time was granted to report on credit of the processed refund.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.