Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
A Reach Stacker used exclusively for container handling within a restricted Inland Container Depot is described as falling outside the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 definition of a motor vehicle because it is a special vehicle adapted only for enclosed premises. The text distinguishes road rollers, which are built for road use, and applies the test of whether a vehicle is adapted for use on roads. Restricted depot roads were not a public place because the public had no right of access. The Reach Stacker's specialised design, excess weight, dismantled transportation, lack of ordinary road-safety features and confined utility supported the exclusion. Non-registration alone was not determinative, but followed from its non-motor-vehicle status.
A Reach Stacker used exclusively for container handling within a restricted Inland Container Depot is described as falling outside the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 definition of a motor vehicle because it is a special vehicle adapted only for enclosed premises. The text distinguishes road rollers, which are built for road use, and applies the test of whether a vehicle is adapted for use on roads. Restricted depot roads were not a public place because the public had no right of access. The Reach Stacker's specialised design, excess weight, dismantled transportation, lack of ordinary road-safety features and confined utility supported the exclusion. Non-registration alone was not determinative, but followed from its non-motor-vehicle status.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.