Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
High Court appellate jurisdiction is excluded where a Tribunal order relates to determination of a question connected with the value of goods for assessment. In an under-valuation and misdeclaration dispute involving imported cold rolled stainless steel, the article notes that an appeal under section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 does not lie to the High Court. The prescribed statutory remedy is an appeal to the Supreme Court under section 130E. The departmental appeal and connected application were therefore dismissed for want of appellate jurisdiction.
High Court appellate jurisdiction is excluded where a Tribunal order relates to determination of a question connected with the value of goods for assessment. In an under-valuation and misdeclaration dispute involving imported cold rolled stainless steel, the article notes that an appeal under section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 does not lie to the High Court. The prescribed statutory remedy is an appeal to the Supreme Court under section 130E. The departmental appeal and connected application were therefore dismissed for want of appellate jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.