Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Page of 4780
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 95596 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
High Court appellate jurisdiction is excluded where a Tribunal order relates to determination of a question connected with the value of goods for assessment. In an under-valuation and misdeclaration dispute involving imported cold rolled stainless steel, the article notes that an appeal under section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 does not lie to the High Court. The prescribed statutory remedy is an appeal to the Supreme Court under section 130E. The departmental appeal and connected application were therefore dismissed for want of appellate jurisdiction.
High Court appellate jurisdiction is excluded where a Tribunal order relates to determination of a question connected with the value of goods for assessment. In an under-valuation and misdeclaration dispute involving imported cold rolled stainless steel, the article notes that an appeal under section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 does not lie to the High Court. The prescribed statutory remedy is an appeal to the Supreme Court under section 130E. The departmental appeal and connected application were therefore dismissed for want of appellate jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.