Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Alternative remedies under the Prevention of Money-Laundering...
Writ maintainability despite alternative remedies permits scrutiny of arbitrary money-laundering initiation, but account-freezing relief requires prima facie justification.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Alternative remedies under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act do not absolutely bar writ jurisdiction where initiation of proceedings is challenged as arbitrary and unjustified, although the challenge may require adjudication after affidavits. The notes distinguish investigative seizure from attachment intended to secure alleged proceeds of crime, and indicate that debit-freezing jurisprudence was not treated as per incuriam. Interim relief against account freezing depends on a prima facie case and balance of convenience. Where the freezing order records substantial transfers requiring factual examination, legality may be addressed before the Adjudicating Authority or after pleadings; the availability of other unfrozen accounts may weigh against interim protection.
Alternative remedies under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act do not absolutely bar writ jurisdiction where initiation of proceedings is challenged as arbitrary and unjustified, although the challenge may require adjudication after affidavits. The notes distinguish investigative seizure from attachment intended to secure alleged proceeds of crime, and indicate that debit-freezing jurisprudence was not treated as per incuriam. Interim relief against account freezing depends on a prima facie case and balance of convenience. Where the freezing order records substantial transfers requiring factual examination, legality may be addressed before the Adjudicating Authority or after pleadings; the availability of other unfrozen accounts may weigh against interim protection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.