Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Alternative remedies under the Prevention of Money-Laundering...
Writ maintainability despite alternative remedies permits scrutiny of arbitrary money-laundering initiation, but account-freezing relief requires prima facie justification.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Alternative remedies under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act do not absolutely bar writ jurisdiction where initiation of proceedings is challenged as arbitrary and unjustified, although the challenge may require adjudication after affidavits. The notes distinguish investigative seizure from attachment intended to secure alleged proceeds of crime, and indicate that debit-freezing jurisprudence was not treated as per incuriam. Interim relief against account freezing depends on a prima facie case and balance of convenience. Where the freezing order records substantial transfers requiring factual examination, legality may be addressed before the Adjudicating Authority or after pleadings; the availability of other unfrozen accounts may weigh against interim protection.
Alternative remedies under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act do not absolutely bar writ jurisdiction where initiation of proceedings is challenged as arbitrary and unjustified, although the challenge may require adjudication after affidavits. The notes distinguish investigative seizure from attachment intended to secure alleged proceeds of crime, and indicate that debit-freezing jurisprudence was not treated as per incuriam. Interim relief against account freezing depends on a prima facie case and balance of convenience. Where the freezing order records substantial transfers requiring factual examination, legality may be addressed before the Adjudicating Authority or after pleadings; the availability of other unfrozen accounts may weigh against interim protection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.