Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Page of 4780
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 95596 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Alternative remedies under the Prevention of Money-Laundering...
Writ maintainability despite alternative remedies permits scrutiny of arbitrary money-laundering initiation, but account-freezing relief requires prima facie justification.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Alternative remedies under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act do not absolutely bar writ jurisdiction where initiation of proceedings is challenged as arbitrary and unjustified, although the challenge may require adjudication after affidavits. The notes distinguish investigative seizure from attachment intended to secure alleged proceeds of crime, and indicate that debit-freezing jurisprudence was not treated as per incuriam. Interim relief against account freezing depends on a prima facie case and balance of convenience. Where the freezing order records substantial transfers requiring factual examination, legality may be addressed before the Adjudicating Authority or after pleadings; the availability of other unfrozen accounts may weigh against interim protection.
Alternative remedies under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act do not absolutely bar writ jurisdiction where initiation of proceedings is challenged as arbitrary and unjustified, although the challenge may require adjudication after affidavits. The notes distinguish investigative seizure from attachment intended to secure alleged proceeds of crime, and indicate that debit-freezing jurisprudence was not treated as per incuriam. Interim relief against account freezing depends on a prima facie case and balance of convenience. Where the freezing order records substantial transfers requiring factual examination, legality may be addressed before the Adjudicating Authority or after pleadings; the availability of other unfrozen accounts may weigh against interim protection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.