Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cheque-dishonour complaints may be instituted only by the payee or a holder in due course. The notes explain that the statutory presumption applies to a holder entitled in their own name to possess the cheque and recover its amount. A deceased payee's spouse was neither the named payee nor an endorsed holder, and the complaints disclosed no probate, letters of administration, succession certificate, or other judicial authority permitting recovery, demand, or valid discharge. As process was issued on the incorrect premise that the cheques were issued to the complainant, the statutory bar rendered the complaints not maintainable. The process orders and consequential proceedings were quashed to prevent abuse of process.
Cheque-dishonour complaints may be instituted only by the payee or a holder in due course. The notes explain that the statutory presumption applies to a holder entitled in their own name to possess the cheque and recover its amount. A deceased payee's spouse was neither the named payee nor an endorsed holder, and the complaints disclosed no probate, letters of administration, succession certificate, or other judicial authority permitting recovery, demand, or valid discharge. As process was issued on the incorrect premise that the cheques were issued to the complainant, the statutory bar rendered the complaints not maintainable. The process orders and consequential proceedings were quashed to prevent abuse of process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.