Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Cheque-dishonour complaints may be instituted only by the payee or a holder in due course. The notes explain that the statutory presumption applies to a holder entitled in their own name to possess the cheque and recover its amount. A deceased payee's spouse was neither the named payee nor an endorsed holder, and the complaints disclosed no probate, letters of administration, succession certificate, or other judicial authority permitting recovery, demand, or valid discharge. As process was issued on the incorrect premise that the cheques were issued to the complainant, the statutory bar rendered the complaints not maintainable. The process orders and consequential proceedings were quashed to prevent abuse of process.
Cheque-dishonour complaints may be instituted only by the payee or a holder in due course. The notes explain that the statutory presumption applies to a holder entitled in their own name to possess the cheque and recover its amount. A deceased payee's spouse was neither the named payee nor an endorsed holder, and the complaints disclosed no probate, letters of administration, succession certificate, or other judicial authority permitting recovery, demand, or valid discharge. As process was issued on the incorrect premise that the cheques were issued to the complainant, the statutory bar rendered the complaints not maintainable. The process orders and consequential proceedings were quashed to prevent abuse of process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.