Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rejection of a GST appeal without affording a hearing and through a cryptic, unreasoned order violated principles of natural justice. The appellate order merely stated a reason for rejection, without supporting reasons, and incorrectly recorded the order-issuing authority. The High Court quashed the appellate order and remanded the appeal for a de novo hearing and a reasoned decision on merits, leaving the parties' substantive contentions open.
Rejection of a GST appeal without affording a hearing and through a cryptic, unreasoned order violated principles of natural justice. The appellate order merely stated a reason for rejection, without supporting reasons, and incorrectly recorded the order-issuing authority. The High Court quashed the appellate order and remanded the appeal for a de novo hearing and a reasoned decision on merits, leaving the parties' substantive contentions open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
