Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Reassessment beyond four years following an assessment under section 143(3) requires failure by the taxpayer to make a full and true disclosure of material facts. The notes state that where the subsidy was disclosed in the financial statements and considered originally, reopening without fresh material constitutes a change of opinion and is invalid. For transfer-pricing benchmarking, an associated enterprise subsidy that routinely compensates unabsorbed distribution costs and is directly linked to distribution operations is treated as operating income. Such subsidy must be included when benchmarking closely linked distribution transactions, rather than excluded in making a transfer-pricing adjustment.
Reassessment beyond four years following an assessment under section 143(3) requires failure by the taxpayer to make a full and true disclosure of material facts. The notes state that where the subsidy was disclosed in the financial statements and considered originally, reopening without fresh material constitutes a change of opinion and is invalid. For transfer-pricing benchmarking, an associated enterprise subsidy that routinely compensates unabsorbed distribution costs and is directly linked to distribution operations is treated as operating income. Such subsidy must be included when benchmarking closely linked distribution transactions, rather than excluded in making a transfer-pricing adjustment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.