Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Foreign exchange fluctuation loss on year-end restatement of an external commercial borrowing used to acquire capital assets remains in the capital field. The notes state that, although the borrowing from the parent company was subsequently converted into equity shares, the loss retained its capital character because the borrowing was obtained for capital assets. Following earlier Tribunal orders in the same taxpayer's case, the loss could not be claimed as business expenditure under the Act. The disallowance was sustained and the appeal was dismissed.
Foreign exchange fluctuation loss on year-end restatement of an external commercial borrowing used to acquire capital assets remains in the capital field. The notes state that, although the borrowing from the parent company was subsequently converted into equity shares, the loss retained its capital character because the borrowing was obtained for capital assets. Following earlier Tribunal orders in the same taxpayer's case, the loss could not be claimed as business expenditure under the Act. The disallowance was sustained and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.