Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
881 to 900 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Coaching for educational qualifications recognised by law is described as exempt from service tax under Notification No. 33/2011-ST. The text states that CA-CPT and ICWA-Foundation are mandatory statutory stages of their respective professional courses, and that advancement to later stages does not negate legal recognition of qualifications obtained at earlier stages. It further states that the notification does not restrict exemption to final-stage coaching or impose requirements concerning fee collection or affiliation for Intermediate coaching. Citing consistent Tribunal decisions, the text notes that Revenue should not take an inconsistent position where exemption was accepted for similar coaching in later periods. The reported conclusion sets aside service-tax demands, interest and penalties, subject to refund being available according to law.
Coaching for educational qualifications recognised by law is described as exempt from service tax under Notification No. 33/2011-ST. The text states that CA-CPT and ICWA-Foundation are mandatory statutory stages of their respective professional courses, and that advancement to later stages does not negate legal recognition of qualifications obtained at earlier stages. It further states that the notification does not restrict exemption to final-stage coaching or impose requirements concerning fee collection or affiliation for Intermediate coaching. Citing consistent Tribunal decisions, the text notes that Revenue should not take an inconsistent position where exemption was accepted for similar coaching in later periods. The reported conclusion sets aside service-tax demands, interest and penalties, subject to refund being available according to law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
