Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Separate penalty on partner and firm barred for the same contravention; admission supported false declaration penalty but amount was reduced.
    Show cause notice and timely adjudication requirements invalidated customs recovery after a decades-long delay and excess demand.
    Classification of automatic soap dispensers turns on dispersing versus spraying, with Chapter 8424 applying to foam dispensing.
    Mandatory appeal limitation under customs law bars condonation beyond the statutory outer limit and excludes the Limitation Act.
    Provisional release conditions must be proportionate; CESTAT reduced onerous bank guarantees while retaining full-value bonds
    Reduced penalty under Section 114A cannot be extended to Section 112(ii) customs penalties; matter remanded for redetermination.
    Natural justice bars fraud classification based on undisclosed material and a non-speaking order; notice and order quashed.
    Post-petition transfer validation under winding-up law upheld for a bona fide transaction benefiting creditors and lacking fraud.
    Section 244 waiver threshold upheld where prima facie oppression, mismanagement, and articles violations supported the petition.
    Section 7 insolvency cannot be used for coercive recovery where a quadripartite transaction is predominantly contractual.
    Limitation under Section 14 extends to prior IBC proceedings barred by pre-existing dispute, keeping the civil suit timely.
    Limitation under insolvency appeals starts from open-court pronouncement, with no condonation beyond the statutory outer limit.
    Project completion and CoC approval in insolvency: NCLAT rejects one promoter proposal, permits another subject to creditor consent.
    FEMA export proceeds and hearsay evidence defeated the commission-related contravention in independent enforcement proceedings.
    FEMA reporting compliance: timely FC-GPR filing with the authorised dealer defeated the penalty where bank delay caused transmission lapse.
    Corporate guarantee without consideration is not taxable as a supply of service, though the GST valuation challenge failed.
    GST appeal limitation and writ condonation fail where no exceptional circumstances justify delay
    Provisional attachment and parallel proceedings: writ challenge failed for lack of foundational facts and statutory post-decisional remedy.
    Alternative remedy and disputed facts led the High Court to decline writ interference in an input tax credit matter.
    Personal hearing requirement under GST natural justice led to quashing of an ex parte assessment order
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Parallel CGST and SGST proceedings for irregular input tax...

      Parallel GST input tax credit proceedings require scrutiny of overlapping charges before separate state assessment is sustained.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      GSTJuly 28, 2026Case LawsHC
      Parallel CGST and SGST proceedings for irregular input tax credit availment require examination of whether both proceedings concern the same credit-disallowance charge arising from discrepancies between suppliers' GSTR-1 and the taxpayer's GSTR-3B. Applying the Supreme Court's twofold test, the High Court directed the SGST authority to reconsider the taxpayer's reply and documents and determine charge overlap. If the charge is identical to that in the CGST proceedings, it may be dropped; the separate audit-based allegation of underreported tax liability may be adjudicated independently. The assessment order was set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication, with merits left open.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax