Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Higher-rate depreciation on a windmill turns on whether it was...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relevant date.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Higher-rate depreciation on a windmill turns on whether it was commissioned and exported electricity before the relevant date. The notes state that a commissioning certificate, grid-interconnection evidence, electricity-generation report and contemporaneous readiness letter supported commissioning in September 2004. They contrast this material with reliance on missing transport and insurance documents, characterising the latter approach as ignoring relevant evidence. The reported conclusion is that the windmill qualified for depreciation at the higher rate, with the appellate authority's position restored.
Higher-rate depreciation on a windmill turns on whether it was commissioned and exported electricity before the relevant date. The notes state that a commissioning certificate, grid-interconnection evidence, electricity-generation report and contemporaneous readiness letter supported commissioning in September 2004. They contrast this material with reliance on missing transport and insurance documents, characterising the latter approach as ignoring relevant evidence. The reported conclusion is that the windmill qualified for depreciation at the higher rate, with the appellate authority's position restored.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.